Paul McCartney stumped for protections for younger artists against A.I. and against their exploitation by tech giants in a recent BBC interview.
This comes after McCartney and his fellow surviving Beatle Sir Ringo Starr used AI to extract the late John Lennon’s vocals from a demo left behind, to create a new song Now and Then. The song has been billed as The Beatles’ very final song and enjoyed critical praise on its release in 2023, nominated for two Grammy Awards.
The Beatle calls on the government to reconsider proposed changes to copyright law.
Paul McCartney has cautioned the UK government about artificial intelligence potentially exploiting artists. He emphasizes the importance of upcoming copyright reforms to safeguard the creative sector.
Legendary musician Paul McCartney is warning against proposed changes to UK copyright law that would allow tech companies to freely train their models on
Paul McCartney said proposed changes to copyright laws that would allow AI developers to use content will make it difficult for artists to make money.
"Somebody's getting paid, so why shouldn't it be the guy who sat down and wrote 'Yesterday'?" the former Beatle said.
Legendary Beatles musician Paul McCartney has urged the British government to ensure upcoming copyright reforms protect artists from being exploited by artificial intelligence (AI). McCartney warned that AI could be used to "rip off" creatives if the proper legal protections aren’t put in place.
Paul McCartney cautions that AI could exploit artists unless UK copyright reforms are enacted. He stresses the need for protections to ensure creators are compensated, as tech giants may otherwise profit.
Beatles musician Paul McCartney has warned that artificial intelligence could be used to "rip off" artists, urging the British government to make sure upcoming copyright reforms protect its creative industries.
Beatles star Paul McCartney has warned that artificial intelligence could “rip off” artists if a proposed overhaul of copyright law goes ahead. McCartney, 82, argued that the plans could remove the incentive for writers and artists and result in a “loss of creativity”.